Skip to main content

Australia rules out open tender for new submarines, Japan in box seat ( Source- The Asean Military Defense Review, Author- Maki Catama)

JS Hakuryu ( Image credits- Wikimedia Commons/ United States Navy)

Source- The Asean Military Defense Review

Author- Maki Catama


Australia will not hold an open tender to replace its ageing Collins-class submarines, government officials said on Tuesday, a decision that bolsters Japan's position as the likely builder of the new multibillion-dollar fleet.

Reuters reported in September that Australia was leaning towards buying as many as 12 off-the-shelf stealth submarines from Japan despite domestic pressure to build them at home.

Since then, several European defence contractors have said they would be price competitive with Japan and do the work in Australia in a bid to win a piece of the overall A$40 billion ($33.96 billion) submarine programme.

But the Australian government did not have time for an open bidding process, said Treasurer Joe Hockey.

"We need to make decisions now and we don't have time to go through a speculation process," Hockey told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

A spokesman for Defence Minister David Johnston said no manufacturer had yet been chosen.

Sources have said Australia is strongly considering a replacement for the Collins based on the 4,000-tonne Soryu-class ships built by Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries.

They have said Canberra wanted a new lithium-ion battery propulsion system, which experts say will give submarines better underwater range and speed compared to other diesel-electric vessels that use air independent propulsion under the sea, a system which requires fuel to operate.

Tokyo's next generation of Soryu submarines will be the world's first to be powered by the new technology.

Swedish defence firm Saab, France's state-controlled naval contractor DCNS and Germany's ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems have all expressed interest in the Australian project.

"I think Japan is the only option for Australia because neither Germany, France nor Sweden has built 4,000-tonne class diesel submarines," a former senior Japanese navy commander told Reuters.

CAN'T BUILD A CANOE

Prime Minister Tony Abbott, under fire after a bruising first year in office, had previously pledged the vessels would be built at the government-owned ASC shipyard in the state of South Australia.

But his cabinet began back-pedalling in July, signalling cost and schedule were paramount. Since then, pressure has mounted for a competitive tender.

Last week Johnston apologised after saying he would not trust ASC "to build a canoe".

Australia has said it would make a final decision in a defence review expected early next year. It needs to begin replacing its Collins submarines by the mid-2030s at the latest.

Such a deal for Japan would mark its re-entry into the global arms market, just months after Prime Minister Shinzo Abe ended a ban on weapons exports as part of his efforts to steer the country away from decades of pacifism.

The opposition Labor Party on Monday sought to force the government to hold an open tender using a procedural motion in the upper house senate. Influential independent South Australian Senator Nick Xenophon criticised the lack of a tender.

"This is no way to run Australia's biggest defence procurement this century," he told Reuters.

"The government is going against leading experts in the naval procurement and turning their backs on thousands of Australian workers, engineers and the skills and expertise they offer our country."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Strategic Vanguard blog is moving to a new website, our new home

  Thank you for your continued interest in Strategic Vanguard. This blog—**strategicvanguard.blogspot.com**—served as an early platform for sharing curated and syndicated content related to global affairs, strategy, and defense. However, this space is no longer updated and is maintained only as an archive. We’ve Moved! Strategic Vanguard Now Has a New Home with Original Blogs, Podcasts & More. This move helps us bring you faster, richer, and 100% original content, without the limitations of legacy platforms like Blogger. --- ✅ **Visit Our Official Website for Fresh, Original Content:**  🌐  https://www.strategicvanguard.com 🌐 https://www.strategicvanguard.com/blog 🌐  https://www.strategicvanguard.com/podcast 🎥 **Subscribe to Our YouTube Channel:** ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/@StrategicVanguard 📬 **For Updates, Podcasts, and Articles:** 📰 Visit the blog and podcast sections at the official site. We are also available in the following social media p...

The Rise and Challenges of the Chinese Navy

The Indian Navy- Protectors of the Seas

  The Strength of the Indian Navy: Navigating Towards Global Maritime Excellence The Indian Navy, a pivotal arm of India's armed forces, plays a crucial role in ensuring maritime security and projecting power in the Indian Ocean region and beyond. With a rich history and a forward-looking strategy, the Indian Navy stands as a testament to India's growing naval prowess and strategic vision. Here’s a closer look at the strength and capabilities that define the Indian Navy today. 1. Historical Legacy and Modernization The Indian Navy's origins trace back to the early 17th century when the Maratha Empire established its naval forces. However, the modern Indian Navy was formally established on October 4, 1950. Over the decades, it has evolved from a modest coastal defense force to a formidable blue-water navy capable of projecting power globally. Modernization has been at the core of its growth, with significant investments in new technologies, ships, submarines, and aircraft. 2...