Skip to main content

The F-35 Stealth Fighter: Too Good For War Games? ( Source- The National Inerest / Author- David Axe)

F-35 A ( Image credits- Wikimedia Commons / USAF)

Author- David Axe

It’s no secret that we at War Is Boring are skeptics when it comes to the F-35 Lightning II. The new, radar-evading, “fifth-generation” warplane is years late, over-budget and — by virtue of its many, sometimes contradictory missions — represents a design compromise, meaning it’s okay at lots of tasks but excels at none of them.


Still, the U.S. military plans to replace nearly all of its current tactical jets with as many as 2,400 F-35s at a total program cost, including maintenance, of around $1 trillion.

The U.S. Air Force, one of the F-35’s main proponents, is understandably optimistic about the single-engine, supersonic fighter — at least in public. Perhaps the strongest recent endorsement came from William Redmond, the executive director of the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

In an unclassified presentation, Redmond claimed he was worried that the F-35 — along with its heavier, twin-engine cousin the F-22 Raptor—would be too sophisticated and capable for the Air Force’s existing test facilities to handle.

“Raptors and Lightnings have voracious appetites,” Redmond stated. “They chew through the adversary with volume and velocity.”

In early June, seven F-35s from Hill Air Force Base in Utah — where the flying branch is getting ready to declare the Lightning combat-ready at the end of 2016 — deployed to Mountain Home Air Force Base in Idaho to train alongside resident F-15Es and A-10s.

During mock combat, the F-35s reportedly shot down eight twin-engine F-15Es, for no losses of their own — this despite the 2015 revelation that the F-35 is inferior to a single-engine F-16 in a simulated dogfight. It’s possible that the Lightning pilots have devised special air-combat tactics that take advantage of the F-35’s stealth and cutting-edge sensors.

According to Redmond, it’s hard to adequately stress the F-35 and F-22 in a simulated combat environment. “Very difficult to generate the threat density and complexity to meet fifth-gen operational test requirements,” he complained.

Of course, the testing problems aren’t entirely a result of the F-35’s alleged superior performance.

The Air Force maintains dedicated “adversary” squadrons whose sole job it is to simulate enemy forces during training exercises. But with the F-35 eating more and more of a flattening budget, the flying branch shuttered one of its then-three adversary units, reducing the number of planes available to play the bad guys during war games.

Besides being short planes to fight the F-35 during tests, the Air Force also lacks realistic simulators for the latest surface-to-air missiles and radio jamming, Redmond stated.

This first appeared in WarIsBoring here

© THE NATIONAL INTEREST ( ALL RIGHTS RESERVED)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Strategic Vanguard blog is moving to a new website, our new home

  Thank you for your continued interest in Strategic Vanguard. This blog strategicvanguard.blogspot.com served as an early platform for sharing curated and syndicated content related to global affairs, strategy, and defense with over 3.18 million readers. However, this space is no longer updated and is maintained only as an archive. We’ve Moved! Strategic Vanguard Now Has a New Home with Original Blogs, Podcasts & More. This move helps us bring you faster, richer, and 100% original content, without the limitations of legacy platforms like Blogger. --- ✅ **Visit Our Official Website for Fresh, Original Content:**  🌐  https://www.strategicvanguard.com 🌐 https://www.strategicvanguard.com/blog 🌐  https://www.strategicvanguard.com/podcast 🎥 **Subscribe to Our YouTube Channel:** ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/@StrategicVanguard 📬 **For Updates, Podcasts, and Articles:** 📰 Visit the blog and podcast sections at the official site. We are also available in t...

Devaluation and Despair: Breaking Down China's Currency Dilemma ( Source- The National Interest / Author- Gordon C. Chang)

Source- Wikimedia Commons / Author- JesseW900 Source- The National Interest Author- Gordon G. Chang On Friday, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), the Chinese central bank, reversed course and set the renminbi on an upward path. That followed three straight days of devaluation that shook global stock, currency, and commodity markets, sending them downward. Friday’s reversal looks responsible. Nonetheless, the PBOC’s actions last week show policy disarray in the Chinese capital. The net result is that Beijing rattled the world, ruined its reputation for stable management, and did almost nothing to help China’s faltering economy. The daily devaluations follow months of government statements that the central bank would keep the currency stable. Every trading morning, 15 minutes before the 9:30 opening bell, central bank officials announce the day’s reference rate against the U.S. dollar. The renminbi, informally known as the yuan, is then allowed to rise or fall 2...

China releases sick propaganda showing Royal Navy ships being blown up - Daily News